Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Partisans and privilege

You know, I never used to wonder about the federal judiciary and how the justices got into those positions. Maybe ignorance is bliss. Because the more I learn, the more uncomfortable I become, both about the professionally incestuous nature of the relationship between the Bush administration and a number of these nominees, and because the question of privilege keeps coming up.

Take the case of Brett Kavanaugh, a nominee to the DC Circuit, one of the two most powerful in the country. As Dana Milbank of the Washington Post puts it, "As a lawyer working for Kenneth Starr during the Whitewater investigation, he was devoted to restricting the powers of the president [by demanding access to documents]. Now, as a lawyer in the Bush White House, he is devoted to expanding the chief executive's powers." The battle over executive (presidential) privilege is already an issue for the Bush (43) presidency (see my earlier post, "The effect of these investigations) ; almost immediately upon entering office in his first term, Bush had Kavanaugh (now working for the administration) draft an executive order further restricting access to such presidential records, but deferring to former presidents and their families. The President Records Act, which he sought to modify, was a product of--you guessed it--the Nixon debacle.

The trigger for Bush's directive? According to the National Security Archives, "[Bush] was notified of a scheduled release of Reagan presidential records (68,000 pages of records). His legal counsel requested two successive 90-day extensions of time to review the records prior to their release followed by a third request for an indefinite extension of time so that the White House could evaluate the legal framework and process that would govern release of the records. This was followed on November 1, 2001 with the issuance of Executive Order (E.O. 13,233) that gives the White House and former presidents uncontrolled discretion [my emphasis] in deciding whether to deny the release of documents requested by journalists and scholars." For the first time, Vice Presidents are also included. Among the documents ultimately withheld:
--a six-page 8 December 1986 memo to the President and Director of Public Affairs entitled, "Talking Points on Iran/Contra Affairs"
--a series of memos dated 22 November and 1 December 1988 for the President entitled, "Pardon for Oliver North, John Poindexter, and Joseph Fernandez"
--a two-page memo for the President from the Attorney General, "Appeal of the Decision Denying the Enforcement of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987"

Ironically, it was not politicians but primarily historians (including the Natl Security Archives) who got up in arms, filing suit in November 2001. The case was ultimately dismissed in March 2004--mistakenly, according again to the same NSA doc I link to above: "A federal judge's dismissal last month of a landmark open government case was based on two factual misconceptions and deserves re-opening". I have not seen any docs online noting any new action.

Eeeenteresting. Back to Kavanaugh: how does one defend arguing against presidential privilege in the one case, and not only buttressing but significantly expanding it in another? Two possiblilities, in Milbank's article: either it's the difference between a criminal inquiry in Whitewater (which trumps privilege) and a civil one (which doesn't), or it's because he's just a really good lawyer, acting in the interests of his client (see also: William Haynes, nominated to the Fourth Circuit).

Let's leave aside the first possibility under "benefit of the doubt"; that sounds like a valid distinction. Moving onto the second, I begin to feel a bit uncomfortable. Because while Kavanaugh has clerked for judges, he has never been a judge. His experience has always been advocating for a client. And for the past several years, his client has been George W. Bush. Coming back to our "benefit of the doubt", on the question of whether Kavanaugh would challenge Bush's presidential privilege in a criminal case, Milbank quotes one of the nominee's former colleagues from Starr's office: "You might have to reassess based on what Brett does at that point."

You know, I just don't understand why we as a nation should have to live with that doubt. I mean, is it me, or does it just seem like a guy who
a) has never been a judge, only an advocate
b) has deep ties to not only the Republican Party in general, but has served in the administration of the sitting president
c) may have to hear cases regarding privilege in re Cheney's Enron/energy policy meetings, and--well, Lord only knows what's coming down the pike with the Downing Street Memo or other inquiries into how our intelligence could have been so wrong about Iraq's WMDs...

Is there really no other candidate in the entire United States that is better qualified to fill a spot on the bench? Seriously. This is not the kind of doubt that should be banished by faith in the president. Have we as a nation come to installing inexperienced partisans with direct patronage ties to an administration that is already noted as one of the most secretive in American history and which has already invoked executive privilege (in the Enron/energy inquiry) and may do so in the future? Well, maybe some Republicans in the Senate will feel that's a risk they don't want to take with the integrity of our Constitutional separation of powers. Why not drop your senators a line?

http://www.senate.gov/

5 Comments:

Blogger oakleyses said...

gucci handbags, oakley sunglasses, ray ban sunglasses, ray ban sunglasses, michael kors outlet, burberry handbags, chanel handbags, christian louboutin outlet, oakley sunglasses, tiffany and co, oakley sunglasses, tiffany jewelry, christian louboutin, longchamp outlet, longchamp outlet, ugg boots, louis vuitton, michael kors outlet online, uggs on sale, christian louboutin uk, nike air max, louis vuitton outlet, polo ralph lauren outlet online, uggs outlet, tory burch outlet, prada outlet, michael kors outlet, burberry outlet, nike air max, oakley sunglasses wholesale, ugg boots, michael kors outlet online, kate spade outlet, uggs outlet, replica watches, louis vuitton outlet, michael kors outlet online, longchamp outlet, polo outlet, michael kors outlet online, prada handbags, nike free, replica watches, louis vuitton outlet, cheap oakley sunglasses, nike outlet, louis vuitton

8:52 PM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

hollister pas cher, jordan pas cher, true religion outlet, lululemon canada, mulberry uk, michael kors, sac longchamp pas cher, nike roshe, nike air max, timberland pas cher, converse pas cher, longchamp pas cher, kate spade, air max, ray ban uk, nike air max uk, sac hermes, sac vanessa bruno, north face uk, polo ralph lauren, north face, michael kors, true religion jeans, ray ban pas cher, nike air force, michael kors outlet, guess pas cher, nike roshe run uk, michael kors pas cher, vans pas cher, coach purses, true religion outlet, ralph lauren uk, coach outlet, abercrombie and fitch uk, replica handbags, coach outlet store online, louboutin pas cher, hollister uk, oakley pas cher, burberry pas cher, nike tn, polo lacoste, nike free uk, nike air max uk, nike blazer pas cher, true religion outlet, hogan outlet, new balance, nike free run

8:54 PM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

ferragamo shoes, north face outlet, north face outlet, lululemon, iphone 5s cases, s6 case, hermes belt, mont blanc pens, nike roshe run, nike trainers uk, mcm handbags, oakley, nike huaraches, baseball bats, insanity workout, babyliss, giuseppe zanotti outlet, reebok outlet, hollister clothing, hollister, timberland boots, bottega veneta, iphone 6 cases, celine handbags, vans outlet, jimmy choo outlet, iphone 6s plus cases, soccer jerseys, mac cosmetics, iphone 6s cases, ralph lauren, valentino shoes, beats by dre, instyler, louboutin, ipad cases, wedding dresses, longchamp uk, p90x workout, nfl jerseys, iphone cases, asics running shoes, new balance shoes, ghd hair, soccer shoes, abercrombie and fitch, herve leger, chi flat iron, iphone 6 plus cases, nike air max

8:55 PM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

swarovski, montre pas cher, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, canada goose outlet, canada goose outlet, converse outlet, ugg pas cher, louis vuitton, moncler, canada goose, hollister, gucci, converse, supra shoes, nike air max, ray ban, louis vuitton, canada goose, louis vuitton, canada goose jackets, pandora charms, moncler outlet, vans, moncler, louis vuitton, replica watches, karen millen uk, louis vuitton, pandora jewelry, juicy couture outlet, doke gabbana, moncler outlet, hollister, canada goose outlet, thomas sabo, pandora jewelry, wedding dresses, marc jacobs, barbour uk, ugg, lancel, swarovski crystal, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, pandora uk, canada goose, juicy couture outlet, moncler uk, canada goose uk, toms shoes, ugg uk, links of london, coach outlet, barbour

8:57 PM  
Blogger 柯云 said...

2016-03-21keyun
kate spade handbags
louis vuitton
true religion jeans outlet
ray ban outlet
replica watches
coach outlet
coach factory outlet
louis vuitton handbags
toms shoes
oakley sunglasses
coach outlet online
ray ban wayfarer
louis vuitton outlet
louis vuitton handbags
canada gooses outlet
replica watches
christian louboutin outlet
christian louboutin shoes
kevin durant 8
polo ralph lauren outlet
michael kors outlet
giuseppe zanotti
cheap jordan shoes
louis vuitton outlet
michael kors outlet
louboutin pas cher
tory burch outlet
true religion outlet
jordans for sale
oakley sunglasses outlet
cheap oakleys
canada goose outlet
christian louboutin outlet
designer handbags
jordan retro 11
polo ralph lauren
cheap oakley sunglasses
coach outlet
toms shoes

12:24 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home